GR00T-N1.7 accuracy alignment
This page compares PhyAI with NVIDIA Isaac-GR00T using theGR00T-N1.7-LIBERO/libero_10
checkpoint.
Result
The benchmark reports an MAE-derived regression score:Avg Acc is not a classification accuracy. The MAE is also not measured on
the normalized 40 x 132 model output. Each request is decoded into the
checkpoint’s 16 x 7 LIBERO action representation. Evaluation takes the first
eight steps and advances by eight, so 25 requests cover all 200 steps of each
trajectory. The resulting 200 x 7 sequence is compared with all 200 recorded
actions.
The corresponding error values are:
Evaluation settings
Both implementations use the same checkpoint, dataset, trajectories, image
transform, prompt construction, precision, action horizon, and seed. MSE and
MAE are calculated for each trajectory in decoded action space, then averaged
across the five trajectories.
Reproduce the PhyAI result
First prepare the checkpoint and Cosmos-Reason2 tokenizer files as described in the GR00T-N1.7 ws1 guide. Clone NVIDIA Isaac-GR00T with Git LFS so the linked LIBERO demo contains itsmeta, data, and videos directories.
From the PhyAI repository root, run:
--online to the first run only if the Cosmos-Reason2 tokenizer and
preprocessor files are not yet cached.
The built-in Cosmos-Reason2 processor does not require remote code. Only pass
--trust-remote-code for a custom processor repository whose code you trust.
The Isaac-GR00T values were computed from decoded actions generated with
NVIDIA’s official model and processor under the same settings. NVIDIA’s
standalone_inference_script.py
implements the corresponding 200-step, horizon-8 evaluation schedule.
